Skip to main content
added 42 characters in body
Source Link
Johnny T.
  • 3.6k
  • 14
  • 29

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true? (or rather the statement holds for $\sup_{\alpha \in I - B}$$\sup_{\alpha \in I - B_N}$ and some subset $B$$B_N$ that depends on $N$. Is it possible to bound the measure of $B$$B_N$ in terms of $N$?).

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true? (or rather the statement holds for $\sup_{\alpha \in I - B}$ and some subset $B$. Is it possible to bound the measure of $B$?).

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true? (or rather the statement holds for $\sup_{\alpha \in I - B_N}$ and some subset $B_N$ that depends on $N$. Is it possible to bound the measure of $B_N$ in terms of $N$?).

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.

added 135 characters in body
Source Link
Johnny T.
  • 3.6k
  • 14
  • 29

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true? (or rather the statement holds for $\sup_{\alpha \in I - B}$ and some subset $B$. Is it possible to bound the measure of $B$?).

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true?

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true? (or rather the statement holds for $\sup_{\alpha \in I - B}$ and some subset $B$. Is it possible to bound the measure of $B$?).

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.

Source Link
Johnny T.
  • 3.6k
  • 14
  • 29

Cardinality of the set $\#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \}$

Let $\alpha \in I$ where $I$ is some closed interval that does not contain $0$. I am interested in upper bound for $$ M(\alpha) = \#\{ 1 \leq n \leq N: \| \alpha n^2/N \| < 1/N \} $$ where $N$ is a sufficiently large positive integer with respect to $I$. I was wondering is it reasonable to expect $$ \sup_{\alpha \in I} M(\alpha) \ll N^{\varepsilon} ? $$ or would one expect this to be not true?

The question is related to my question from couple years ago (Distribution of $\alpha n^2/q$ modulo $1$?) in which a reference to Lemma 1 of http://www.numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1999_4_28_4_591_0.pdf was given. Here an upper bound is given, but it wasn't clear to me if it was sharp or not. Any input would be appreciated. Thank you.