Timeline for Computations in the Deligne-Mumford compactification with marked points
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2010 at 8:11 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Perhaps the first step is for you to describe the normalized family in equations. | |
| Nov 22, 2010 at 16:42 | comment | added | Alex | I wish to mark all points above 0, 1, $\lambda$ and $\infty$. | |
| Nov 22, 2010 at 10:09 | history | edited | Charles Matthews | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo
|
| Nov 22, 2010 at 7:29 | comment | added | Torsten Ekedahl | In that case your problem doesn't always seem well defined, when $N$ is not relatively prime to one of $a$, $b$, $c$ or $a+b+c$ there will be several points above one of $0$, $1$, $\lambda$ or $\infty$ and you have to tell which one you mark. | |
| Nov 22, 2010 at 5:29 | comment | added | Alex | About the original curves: I mean the Riemann surfaces obtained as the normalization of the algebraic curve with given equation. | |
| Nov 22, 2010 at 5:20 | comment | added | Torsten Ekedahl | If $N>2$ your original curves are not stable unless $a=b=c=1$ and then the limit curve is not stable unless $a+b\leq1$ (if $N=2$ the conditions are a little bit less stringent). | |
| Nov 22, 2010 at 4:40 | answer | added | Sándor Kovács | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 22, 2010 at 4:10 | history | asked | Alex | CC BY-SA 2.5 |