Timeline for Is there a correction to the failure of geometric morphisms to preserve internal homs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25 at 20:25 | answer | added | Ingo Blechschmidt | timeline score: 7 | |
| S Apr 25 at 10:01 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 25 at 10:01 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Apr 17 at 8:56 | history | bounty started | Cameron | ||
| S Apr 17 at 8:56 | history | notice added | Cameron | Draw attention | |
| Apr 3 at 10:10 | comment | added | Cameron | Thanks, I meant a geometric morphism between toposes, as in ncatlab.org/nlab/show/geometric+morphism. I've edited the question | |
| Apr 3 at 10:09 | history | edited | Cameron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Apr 3 at 10:08 | comment | added | Sasha | The context of your question is very much unclear --- what are $\mathcal{E}$, $\mathcal{F}$, $X$, $Y$? What do you mean by a geometric morphism? | |
| Apr 3 at 9:48 | history | asked | Cameron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |