Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
Notice added Draw attention by Cameron
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Cameron
added 107 characters in body
Source Link
Cameron
  • 171
  • 4

Given a geometric morphismgeometric morphism $$f:\mathscr{F}\to\mathscr{E}$$ where $\mathscr{F},\mathscr{E}$ are toposes, we know that $f^*$ does not preserve internal homs, i.e. $f^*[X,Y]\ncong[f^*X,f^*Y]$. We do have a morphism $\Phi:f^*[X,Y]\to[f^*X,f^*Y]$, though no extra conditions on this morphism (SGA4, Tome 1, Exposé iv, 10.5). Similarly, if $(\mathscr{E},A)$ is a ringed topos, $f^*$ does not preserve internal Ext, i.e. $$f^*\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)\ncong\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_{f^*A}(f^*M,f^*N),$$ where $\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)$ is the right derived functor of the internal $A$-hom $[M,N]_A$. Does there exist a correction to this, e.g. a spectral sequence that relates the two?

Given a geometric morphism $$f:\mathscr{F}\to\mathscr{E}$$ we know that $f^*$ does not preserve internal homs, i.e. $f^*[X,Y]\ncong[f^*X,f^*Y]$. We do have a morphism $\Phi:f^*[X,Y]\to[f^*X,f^*Y]$, though no extra conditions on this morphism (SGA4, Tome 1, Exposé iv, 10.5). Similarly, if $(\mathscr{E},A)$ is a ringed topos, $f^*$ does not preserve internal Ext, i.e. $$f^*\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)\ncong\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_{f^*A}(f^*M,f^*N),$$ where $\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)$ is the right derived functor of the internal $A$-hom $[M,N]_A$. Does there exist a correction to this, e.g. a spectral sequence that relates the two?

Given a geometric morphism $$f:\mathscr{F}\to\mathscr{E}$$ where $\mathscr{F},\mathscr{E}$ are toposes, we know that $f^*$ does not preserve internal homs, i.e. $f^*[X,Y]\ncong[f^*X,f^*Y]$. We do have a morphism $\Phi:f^*[X,Y]\to[f^*X,f^*Y]$, though no extra conditions on this morphism (SGA4, Tome 1, Exposé iv, 10.5). Similarly, if $(\mathscr{E},A)$ is a ringed topos, $f^*$ does not preserve internal Ext, i.e. $$f^*\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)\ncong\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_{f^*A}(f^*M,f^*N),$$ where $\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)$ is the right derived functor of the internal $A$-hom $[M,N]_A$. Does there exist a correction to this, e.g. a spectral sequence that relates the two?

Source Link
Cameron
  • 171
  • 4

Is there a correction to the failure of geometric morphisms to preserve internal homs?

Given a geometric morphism $$f:\mathscr{F}\to\mathscr{E}$$ we know that $f^*$ does not preserve internal homs, i.e. $f^*[X,Y]\ncong[f^*X,f^*Y]$. We do have a morphism $\Phi:f^*[X,Y]\to[f^*X,f^*Y]$, though no extra conditions on this morphism (SGA4, Tome 1, Exposé iv, 10.5). Similarly, if $(\mathscr{E},A)$ is a ringed topos, $f^*$ does not preserve internal Ext, i.e. $$f^*\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)\ncong\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_{f^*A}(f^*M,f^*N),$$ where $\underline{\text{Ext}}^n_A(M,N)$ is the right derived functor of the internal $A$-hom $[M,N]_A$. Does there exist a correction to this, e.g. a spectral sequence that relates the two?