Timeline for Consequences of Kirti Joshi's new preprint about p-adic Teichmüller theory on the validity of IUT and on the ABC conjecture
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2 at 5:49 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | Also, doubly so with my moderator hat on, MO is really not a discussion platform, and discussing correctness of preprints is, by long-standing precedence, not on-topic. Also please note that the original question is about consequences of your preprints assuming they are correct (particularly wrt IUT). With respect, having an extended discussion about your responses to questions about your preprints shouldn't really continue here. | |
| Apr 2 at 5:41 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | @KirtiJoshi please be aware of the distinction between the comment box and the answer box. I've moved your "answer" in reply to Thomas to a comment. Also, @-mentioning another user in an answer will not notify them. | |
| Apr 2 at 5:05 | comment | added | Alec Rhea | Kirti, as a casual observer for most of these discussions, I’d like to commend you on your professionalism and respect for mathematics. Irrespective of how things shake out regarding ABC, I respect the decorum and deference to mathematics present in the papers of yours I’ve read on the subject. Best of luck dealing with all this drama. | |
| Apr 2 at 3:41 | comment | added | Thomas Kojar | I think it will be good to add your responses to that remark-9 as part of your Q&A-file since it is a crucial point. And in particular a response to the answer by Scholze mathoverflow.net/a/435112/99863 and his comments below it. | |
| Apr 2 at 3:09 | comment | converted from answer | Kirti Joshi | @Thomas Kojar My discussion of that point is here and a more technical discussion can be found in this paper, Section 1.2--1.4. | |
| Apr 2 at 2:02 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | To anyone wondering about the proliferation of Joshi's accounts (as this post has been flagged), I think we have figured out why, and one more account merge/cleanup should happen in the coming days. | |
| Apr 1 at 23:22 | comment | added | Thomas Kojar | Can you also include in the Q&A file a response to the above comment by Scholze about Remark 9 from their note mathoverflow.net/a/435112/99863? | |
| Apr 1 at 22:52 | history | answered | Kirti Joshi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |