Timeline for Proof that the inclusion $\Delta \to \mathbf{Pos}$ preserves colimits
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 26 at 11:44 | vote | accept | Calin Tataru | ||
Mar 26 at 11:44 | comment | added | Calin Tataru | This makes sense, thank you! Yeah the proof for $\mathbf{TOrd} \to \mathbf{Pos}$ uses the fact that every partial order has a total order extension. | |
Mar 26 at 2:54 | comment | added | David Gao | A technical point: I glossed over the possibility that $\cup_{j \in J} \mathrm{range}(\psi_j) = \varnothing$ in my proof. But since $\Delta$ does not contain the empty set, this could only happen when $F$ is the empty diagram. But $\Delta$ has no initial object, so in that case $F$ does not admit a colimit in $\Delta$ in the first place. | |
Mar 26 at 2:43 | comment | added | David Gao | I’d say the proof that $\mathbf{TOrd} \to \mathbf{Pos}$ preserves colimits is pretty similar, where one can use the completion of partial orders to total orders to show that $\cup_{j \in J} \mathrm{range}(\psi_j)$ must be totally ordered if a colimit in $\mathbf{TOrd}$ exists. | |
Mar 26 at 2:34 | history | answered | David Gao | CC BY-SA 4.0 |