Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 29 at 5:25 answer added Kirti Joshi timeline score: 16
Apr 1 at 22:29 answer added Kirti Joshi timeline score: 56
Mar 31 at 14:19 comment added Timothy Chow @Nico See the last line of Will Sawin's answer.
Mar 30 at 19:53 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 43
Mar 30 at 19:50 comment added Nico @LuisFerroni Do you have a link?
Mar 30 at 6:02 history became hot network question
Mar 29 at 19:58 vote accept Jon23
Mar 29 at 18:59 answer added Peter Scholze timeline score: 124
Mar 28 at 19:48 answer added CHUAKS timeline score: 20
Mar 26 at 10:03 comment added Jon23 The idea seems to be that for a given large $n$, for each $p$ one has an ABC inequality with a certain constant coming from the triple $(1,p^n,1+p^n)$, and that one can construct some other triple such that its ABC inequality cannot be obtained by summing those of its prime factors, the large $n$ presumably inversely related to the $\epsilon$ in the usual ABC statement, or something of the sort, but I cannot work out the argument.
Mar 25 at 14:27 history edited Jeremy Rouse CC BY-SA 4.0
Corrected misspelling in title of question
Mar 25 at 12:17 history asked Jon23 CC BY-SA 4.0