Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 24 at 11:29 comment added Farran Khawaja @StevenStadnicki The loopy games that are 'number-comparable' are the ones that are only an element of either the left or right options, not both. So for example ∞ = {N|∞} is a valid loopy number in this construction but something like A={A|A} is not valid.
Mar 24 at 1:30 comment added Joel David Hamkins Also, for nonArchimedean ordered fields, one usually considers not the Dedekind completion (since this is not generally a field, even in the set case), but the Dedekindean completion, which considers only the bridgeable gaps, which can be traversed by arbitrarily small elements of the field. The Dedekindean completion of an ordered field is Dedekindean complete. However, Gödel-Bernays does not prove that the surreal numbers have a Dedekindean completion.
Mar 24 at 1:29 comment added Joel David Hamkins It seems to me that any discussion of gaps in the surreal line will be taking place not in set theory, but in class theory, but you haven't specified what your class theory context is, whether Gödel-Bernays or Kelley-Morse or full second-order logic.
Mar 23 at 22:58 history edited Gerry Myerson CC BY-SA 4.0
typo
Mar 23 at 22:13 comment added Steven Stadnicki First issue I can think of: how do you restrict your loopy games to those that are 'number-comparable'? And as to why the Dedekind construction is preferred, a large part of it is that the construction is well-known; it's a canonical method of constructing a complete linear order from any suitable linear order, and since $No$ is a linear order it makes sense to look at the 'standard' completion of it.
Mar 23 at 21:41 history edited Farran Khawaja CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixed formatting
S Mar 23 at 21:36 review First questions
Mar 23 at 23:22
S Mar 23 at 21:36 history asked Farran Khawaja CC BY-SA 4.0