Timeline for A pair of non-conjugate subgroups: a simple proof
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24 at 4:39 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 23 at 22:12 | vote | accept | emiliocba | ||
| Mar 23 at 21:37 | answer | added | LSpice | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 23 at 21:17 | comment | added | kindasorta | @LSpice thanks for pointing that out. I deleted my comment since it contained incorrect information. | |
| Mar 23 at 21:10 | comment | added | emiliocba | kindasorta: it is well known that the groups are not conjugate in $S_6$. In fact, the corresponding pair in $S_6$ was the first pair of almost-conjugate groups constructed by Gassmann. | |
| Mar 23 at 21:08 | comment | added | emiliocba | LSpice: yes, it was a typo. I meant $G=SO(6)$. Thanks! | |
| Mar 23 at 21:07 | history | edited | emiliocba | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
$G$ was replaces by $SO(6)$
|
| Mar 23 at 20:52 | comment | added | LSpice | What is $G$ in "$G$-conjugacy classes"? Is it $\operatorname{SO}(6)$? | |
| Mar 23 at 20:51 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typos
|
| Mar 23 at 20:37 | history | asked | emiliocba | CC BY-SA 4.0 |