Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 14 at 6:12 comment added Hao S @SaúlRM edited question
Jun 14 at 6:11 history edited Hao S CC BY-SA 4.0
added 13 characters in body
Jun 13 at 15:33 comment added Saúl RM @HaoS Could you edit the question to include the condition that by "small set of edges" you mean $o(V(G))$ edges? I was thinking of sharing this question but as it is now, one needs to read the comments to understand the question
S Jun 9 at 0:08 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Jun 9 at 0:08 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jun 5 at 16:16 comment added Hao S @IlyaBogdanov the planar separator theorem
Jun 5 at 12:43 comment added Ilya Bogdanov So is it true that such set of order $O(\sqrt{V(G)})$ (or at least $o(V(G))$) exists for any planar graph?
S May 31 at 22:08 history bounty started Hao S
S May 31 at 22:08 history notice added Hao S Draw attention
Mar 29 at 18:36 comment added Hao S Ah yes forget I said $ o(\sqrt(V(G)))$ lets just say $o(V(G)) $
Mar 29 at 9:28 comment added Louis Esperet Sorry I meant $\Omega(\sqrt{|V(G)|})$ ! In your comment above you speculated that $o(\sqrt{|V(G)|})$ could be possible.
Mar 27 at 21:51 comment added Hao S @LouisEsperet, doesn't just taking a path from the middle node of the top to the middle node of the bottom plus a few more edges work? Can you draw your example?
Mar 27 at 16:04 comment added Louis Esperet You won't be able to beat $\Omega(|V(G)|)$ (take a grid and add an edge between two vertices at distance 4, which are not on the same face, in order to make it non planar).
Mar 25 at 3:55 comment added Tony Huynh Ah, I see. The question makes sense to me now.
Mar 24 at 21:38 comment added Hao S @TonyHuynh My definition of separator is different it is, the removal of all edges that intersect or share an endpoint of an edge of $S$, In laymens terms, I remove the region of the plane occupied by edges of $S$ It's not clear that a complete graph doesn't have this kind of "separator"
Mar 24 at 21:09 comment added Tony Huynh @HaoS My point is that the complete graphs do not have sublinear separators (according to your definition).
Mar 22 at 18:08 comment added Hao S @TonyHuynh I don't the problem is not about embedding it's about separators.
Mar 22 at 4:35 comment added Tony Huynh You probably also want to bound the number of crossings, or have some other assumption like $k$-planarity. Otherwise, every graph can be drawn in the plane with crossings.
Mar 22 at 4:13 history edited Hao S CC BY-SA 4.0
added 30 characters in body
Mar 22 at 4:05 comment added Salvo Tringali Something is missing in your last sentence. Maybe "is planar"?
Mar 22 at 1:25 comment added Hao S @MoisheKohan o(|V(G)) or even say o( $\sqrt |V(G)| $ )
Mar 22 at 0:36 comment added Moishe Kohan What is "small" and what is the question?
Mar 21 at 23:30 history asked Hao S CC BY-SA 4.0