Timeline for Is there any work on distributional vector fields?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20 at 23:10 | history | edited | cheshircat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 285 characters in body
|
| Mar 20 at 17:03 | history | edited | cheshircat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Mar 20 at 17:03 | comment | added | cheshircat | Yes @CarloBeenakker you are right, I have edited the question now. | |
| Mar 20 at 16:36 | vote | accept | cheshircat | ||
| Mar 20 at 17:56 | |||||
| Mar 20 at 8:18 | comment | added | terceira | The fact that every distribution on the line has a primitive which is unique up to a constant is a basic and elementary fact which can be found early on in pretty well any introduction, in particular in the initial treatment of Laurent Schwartz. The proof is simple and elementary. | |
| Mar 20 at 4:40 | answer | added | Willie Wong | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 19 at 21:20 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 19 at 20:31 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | you probably want $-x(t)$ to be the solution (to cancel the minus sign from partial integration) | |
| Mar 19 at 19:48 | history | asked | cheshircat | CC BY-SA 4.0 |