Timeline for Is it fine to correct and extend texts of a late colleague when publishing them?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13 at 14:09 | comment | added | André Henriques | @mlk. In the situation that you describe, Part I could be the material from the other authors, and Part II could be the manuscript from the late colleague. | |
| Mar 13 at 10:51 | comment | added | mlk | I think that works well if the colleague was someone who likes to work linearly, i.e. in the case where the first n chapters are more or less done and chapters (n+1)ff only exist as an outline. In case of someone who likes to work backwards by starting with the main theorems and then works backwards from them to the introductory materials, I fear this would be rather unreadable. | |
| Mar 13 at 9:53 | history | answered | André Henriques | CC BY-SA 4.0 |