Timeline for Assuming the Collatz conjecture is false, what is known about the size of the false set?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11 at 19:18 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 11 at 12:20 | vote | accept | Yaakov Baruch | ||
| Mar 11 at 12:14 | comment | added | Yaakov Baruch | @Wojowu You are right. I edited the question to reflect what I really had in mind: to assume there is an infinite orbit. I don't know if the term "stronlgy" that I used is the appropriate one though. | |
| Mar 11 at 12:13 | answer | added | Wojowu | timeline score: 39 | |
| Mar 11 at 12:11 | history | edited | Yaakov Baruch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| Mar 11 at 11:47 | comment | added | Wojowu | How do you get $c=\infty$? It could be that all orbits settle into a cycle rather than blowing up to infinity. Anyway, Wikipedia mentions the bound that $\gg n^{0.84}$ elements below $n$ will reach $1$, and brief search suggests this is still state of the art. | |
| Mar 11 at 11:22 | history | edited | Yaakov Baruch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Mar 11 at 11:13 | history | asked | Yaakov Baruch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |