Skip to main content
edited title
Link
ThorbenK
  • 1.2k
  • 7
  • 19

When is the classifying space of a group/H-space rationally equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-MaclaneMacLane spaces?

Maclane -> MacLane
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

The MO-questionMO-question asks why the classifying space of a group is not necessarily rationally a product of Eilenberg-MaclaneEilenberg–MacLane spaces. I am looking for classes of examples of connected topological groups/connected associative H-spaces such that their classifying space happens to be rationally a product of Eilenberg-MaclaneEilenberg–MacLane spaces. I'm the most interested in examples of groups that have an interesting action on a closed manifold.

So far I know that this holds for

  • compact groups, because the cohomology ring of their classifying space is a polynomial ring
  • Lie groups since they are homotopy equivalent to their maximal compact subgroup
  • the identity component of the homotopy automorphisms of an aspherical space, because its classifying space is already an Eilenberg-MaclaneEilenberg–MacLane space.

The MO-question asks why the classifying space of a group is not necessarily rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I am looking for classes of examples of connected topological groups/connected associative H-spaces such that their classifying space happens to be rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I'm the most interested in examples of groups that have an interesting action on a closed manifold.

So far I know that this holds for

  • compact groups, because the cohomology ring of their classifying space is a polynomial ring
  • Lie groups since they are homotopy equivalent to their maximal compact subgroup
  • the identity component of the homotopy automorphisms of an aspherical space, because its classifying space is already an Eilenberg-Maclane space

The MO-question asks why the classifying space of a group is not necessarily rationally a product of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces. I am looking for classes of examples of connected topological groups/connected associative H-spaces such that their classifying space happens to be rationally a product of Eilenberg–MacLane spaces. I'm the most interested in examples of groups that have an interesting action on a closed manifold.

So far I know that this holds for

  • compact groups, because the cohomology ring of their classifying space is a polynomial ring
  • Lie groups since they are homotopy equivalent to their maximal compact subgroup
  • the identity component of the homotopy automorphisms of an aspherical space, because its classifying space is already an Eilenberg–MacLane space.
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
ThorbenK
  • 1.2k
  • 7
  • 19

The MO-questionMO-question asks why the classifying space of a group is not necessarily rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I am looking for classes of examples of connected topological groups/connected associative H-spaces such that their classifying space happens to be rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I'm the most interested in examples of groups that have an interesting action on a closed manifold.

So far I know that this holds for

  • compact groups, because the cohomology ring of their classifying space is a polynomial ring
  • Lie groups since they are homotopy equivalent to their maximal compact subgroup
  • the identity component of the homotopy automorphisms of an aspherical space, because its classifying space is already an Eilenberg-Maclane space

The MO-question asks why the classifying space of a group is not necessarily rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I am looking for classes of examples of connected topological groups/connected associative H-spaces such that their classifying space happens to be rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I'm the most interested in examples of groups that have an interesting action on a closed manifold.

So far I know that this holds for

  • compact groups, because the cohomology ring of their classifying space is a polynomial ring
  • Lie groups since they are homotopy equivalent to their maximal compact subgroup
  • the identity component of the homotopy automorphisms of an aspherical space, because its classifying space is already an Eilenberg-Maclane space

The MO-question asks why the classifying space of a group is not necessarily rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I am looking for classes of examples of connected topological groups/connected associative H-spaces such that their classifying space happens to be rationally a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces. I'm the most interested in examples of groups that have an interesting action on a closed manifold.

So far I know that this holds for

  • compact groups, because the cohomology ring of their classifying space is a polynomial ring
  • Lie groups since they are homotopy equivalent to their maximal compact subgroup
  • the identity component of the homotopy automorphisms of an aspherical space, because its classifying space is already an Eilenberg-Maclane space
added 84 characters in body
Source Link
ThorbenK
  • 1.2k
  • 7
  • 19
Loading
Source Link
ThorbenK
  • 1.2k
  • 7
  • 19
Loading