Timeline for Parameterizing Teichmüller spaces of punctured surfaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7 at 0:34 | vote | accept | Yousuf Soliman | ||
| Mar 6 at 23:24 | comment | added | Sam Nead | @YousufSoliman - if my answer has now answered your question, you might want to accept it (by clicking the check mark). | |
| Mar 6 at 23:06 | comment | added | Yousuf Soliman | @SamNead Thanks! I see right away that this doesn’t even work for $n=1$ | |
| Mar 6 at 22:56 | comment | added | Yousuf Soliman | Hi @MoisheKohan, I see. This is about the markings around the points. Thanks. | |
| Mar 6 at 22:33 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | @YousufSoliman: Do you know the definition of the Teichmuller space? You are attempting to define inverse to a universal covering map. | |
| Mar 6 at 22:00 | history | edited | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 193 characters in body
|
| Mar 6 at 21:54 | comment | added | Yousuf Soliman | @MoisheKohan Why is $\Phi$ not well-defined? | |
| Mar 6 at 21:52 | history | edited | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 265 characters in body
|
| Mar 6 at 21:41 | comment | added | Sam Nead | Oops! I’ll delete my answer and rewrite. | |
| Mar 6 at 21:30 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | Not only it is not a homeomorphism, it is not even well-defined. | |
| Mar 6 at 20:31 | comment | added | Yousuf Soliman | Thank you. Do you have a reference or a proof sketch that $\Phi$ is a homeomorphism? | |
| Mar 6 at 20:19 | history | answered | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |