Timeline for Bochner Laplacian in coordinates
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 at 19:58 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 4 at 18:52 | vote | accept | B.Hueber | ||
| Mar 4 at 18:01 | answer | added | Willie Wong | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 4 at 15:31 | history | edited | B.Hueber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 959 characters in body
|
| Mar 4 at 15:27 | comment | added | B.Hueber | @BenceRacskó Sure, its at the beginning of page 457. | |
| Mar 4 at 13:14 | comment | added | Bence Racskó | Can you specify where in Nicolaescu's lecture notes do you find the formula $(\ast)$? | |
| Mar 4 at 12:49 | history | edited | B.Hueber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 70 characters in body
|
| Mar 4 at 12:30 | comment | added | B.Hueber | @PierrePC I rewrote the question to make it more clear. | |
| Mar 4 at 12:30 | history | edited | B.Hueber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 697 characters in body
|
| Mar 4 at 12:04 | comment | added | B.Hueber | @PierrePC thats exactly my point. This is wrong, but the formula of Nicolaescu suggests this. | |
| Mar 4 at 11:55 | comment | added | Pierre PC | You say that "the equation above" gives $\Delta f=g^{ij}\partial_i\partial_jf$. Which one is this equation? I don't know if this is the issue, but in general it is not true that $(\nabla^2T)_{ij}=\partial_i\partial_jf$. | |
| Mar 4 at 11:39 | history | asked | B.Hueber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |