Timeline for Functions whose antiderivative behaves like xf(x)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2016 at 16:43 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 20, 2016 at 15:44 | history | edited | Adam Hughes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor typesetting fix
|
Nov 20, 2010 at 19:46 | vote | accept | Adam Hughes | ||
Nov 20, 2010 at 16:43 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | I have made major revisions in my earlier answer which gives a more definitive result applicable to a wider class of functions. | |
Nov 19, 2010 at 15:00 | answer | added | Todd Trimble | timeline score: 13 | |
Nov 19, 2010 at 11:34 | history | edited | Todd Trimble | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
inserted a missing sign
|
Nov 19, 2010 at 7:10 | comment | added | Harald Hanche-Olsen | Regarding notation: Computer scientists tend to use big theta for your $(*)$, i.e., $F(x)=\Theta(xf(x))$. | |
Nov 19, 2010 at 4:48 | history | edited | Alex B. |
removed the nt-tag
|
|
Nov 19, 2010 at 1:52 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Why not do it in terms of the integral $F(x)$? Your condition $F(x) \sim x F'(x)$ implies that $x^{-1} \sim \frac{d}{dx} \log F(x)$. Which says that a necessary condition is that there exists $n,N$ such that $x^n = O(F(x))$ and $F(x) = O(x^N)$. | |
Nov 19, 2010 at 1:46 | history | edited | Adam Hughes | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
no idea why the word "Denote" was randomly in there
|
Nov 19, 2010 at 1:41 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
spelling/grammar in title
|
Nov 19, 2010 at 1:28 | history | edited | Adam Hughes | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Nov 19, 2010 at 1:19 | history | asked | Adam Hughes | CC BY-SA 2.5 |