Timeline for What is the proof of consistency of anterior reflection?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29 at 12:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 8 at 3:09 | |||||
| Feb 29 at 12:02 | comment | added | Monroe Eskew | This comment will probably be removed as inappropriate, but I feel this question illustrates the problem with many of your posts. This is a legitimate question touching on the important Reflection Theorem of ZF, but it is an easy exercise for anyone who has gotten to that result in their first course on set theory. Could you please read a standard book on set theory like Jech, and start asking questions based on that? It seems like you have been trapped in a fascination with formal syntax and axioms for years, and you never get around to learning the actual content of set theory. | |
| Feb 29 at 11:24 | history | edited | Zuhair Al-Johar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Feb 26 at 15:14 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Feb 24 at 17:35 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Feb 24 at 11:55 | vote | accept | Zuhair Al-Johar | ||
| Feb 24 at 11:42 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 24 at 9:48 | history | edited | Zuhair Al-Johar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Feb 24 at 9:33 | history | asked | Zuhair Al-Johar | CC BY-SA 4.0 |