Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3 at 7:06 comment added Tyrone Thanks for the correction, @KPHart.
Mar 3 at 7:05 history edited Tyrone CC BY-SA 4.0
added 67 characters in body
Mar 1 at 9:00 comment added KP Hart The cellularity of $\beta\mathbb{N}\setminus\mathbb{N}$ is equal to $2^{\aleph_0}$ rather than $\aleph_1$.
Feb 22 at 8:23 comment added Pietro Majer In fact what I’m mostly interested is when X is a compact Hausdorff space with no other assumptions: what can be said on the family of its closed subsets A for which there exists a linear bounded extender? (e.g. question 2, and question 3 , added now). On the Corollary: so it gives another proof of $c_0$ not being complemented in $\ell_\infty$, ritgth?
Feb 22 at 8:06 comment added Pietro Majer Thank you for the detailed answer! The existence of a continuous extender is in fact a consequence of Tietze (the restriction operator $C(X)\to C(Y)$ being surjective), because every surjective bounded linear operator between Banach space, admits a continuous right inverse (in general nonlinear, nor differentiable) .
Feb 22 at 7:57 history answered Tyrone CC BY-SA 4.0