Timeline for Coloured Jones polynomial of the mirror image of a multicomponent link
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20 at 21:26 | comment | added | Abdelmalek Abdesselam | It should be easy to check with the help of the introduction by Murakami arxiv.org/abs/1002.0126 and in particular the explicit formula 2.2 for R and 2.4 for its inverse. | |
| Feb 20 at 17:35 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title
|
| Feb 20 at 14:48 | comment | added | Calvin McPhail-Snyder | Actually you might need to be a little more careful: for a mirror image (not just orientation change) you also need to invert the R matrices and that’s a more complicated change. | |
| Feb 20 at 14:47 | comment | added | Calvin McPhail-Snyder | I am pretty sure this is true. If it is the proof would to be understanding how taking duals affects the highest weights of your modules, and this should correspond to the inversions you mentioned. However I haven’t thought about this carefully and I’m not sure if exactly the statement you want is written down anywhere. | |
| Feb 20 at 14:29 | history | edited | hopftype | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 291 characters in body
|
| S Feb 19 at 16:49 | review | First questions | |||
| Feb 19 at 19:12 | |||||
| S Feb 19 at 16:49 | history | asked | hopftype | CC BY-SA 4.0 |