Timeline for Conformal Killing fields satisfy a third order PDE
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 17 at 3:26 | history | edited | Willie Wong | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1045 characters in body
|
Feb 15 at 20:15 | vote | accept | Laithy | ||
Feb 15 at 20:14 | comment | added | Laithy | I just read your explanation. That's exactly what I planned to do! Thank you for your help. | |
Feb 15 at 19:16 | comment | added | Igor Khavkine | @Laithy, see added explanation. | |
Feb 15 at 19:15 | history | edited | Igor Khavkine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1108 characters in body
|
Feb 15 at 17:55 | comment | added | Laithy | In the reference you sent, it seems that they write an expression of $\nabla^2 \text{div} X$ instead of $\nabla^3 X$. Does that imply a similar expression for $\nabla^3 X$? Either way, this suffices for my purposes. Thank you very much. I am trying to prove proposition 3.2 in the referenced paper under more relaxed conditions, (for manifolds that are not asymptotically flat and for rougher vector fields.) | |
Feb 14 at 22:40 | history | answered | Igor Khavkine | CC BY-SA 4.0 |