Timeline for An explicit matrix form
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4 at 23:05 | vote | accept | scsnm | ||
| Feb 4 at 23:03 | comment | added | scsnm | I apologize. I didn't realize I put the group $G$ mistakenly. It is supposed to be a symplectic group. I will write another question. So sorry. | |
| Feb 4 at 23:00 | comment | added | LSpice | @scsnm, re, then I don't understand what it means for the form to be $\Delta\left[\begin{pmatrix} & 1 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix}\right]_m$. An orthogonal form should have a symmetric matrix. | |
| Feb 4 at 22:59 | comment | added | scsnm | Sorry about that. It means $m$-copies embedded diagonally. | |
| Feb 4 at 22:57 | comment | added | LSpice | @scsnm, re, I don't understand your notation. What is $\Delta[\cdot]_m$? | |
| Feb 4 at 22:51 | comment | added | scsnm | Thank you for the input. If my form is $$\Delta \left[ \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} \right]_m,$$ would the answer be$$\Delta \left[ \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix} \right]_m$$ instead? | |
| Feb 4 at 22:47 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Different wording for "2"; m = 1 case
|
| Feb 4 at 22:41 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Different wording for "2"
|
| Feb 4 at 22:35 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
One more try at the isogeny
|
| Feb 4 at 22:28 | history | answered | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |