Timeline for If the operators $B_i'$ satisfy an inequality, prove that $B_1'+\dotsb+ B_n'$ also satisfies the same inequality
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jan 31 at 21:06 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jan 31 at 21:06 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
S Jan 23 at 19:11 | history | bounty started | matilda | ||
S Jan 23 at 19:11 | history | notice added | matilda | Draw attention | |
Jan 21 at 16:50 | comment | added | matilda | @LSpice- Thank you, appreciate the edits. | |
Jan 21 at 15:15 | comment | added | LSpice |
TeX notes: for norms, you want \lVert \rVert . Compare, for example, $||f||$ ||f|| to $\lVert f\rVert$ \lVert f\rVert . (\| \| is better but can fail, e.g., $\|-f\|$ \|-f\| vs. $\lVert-f\rVert$ \lVert-f\rVert .) Also, \dots can only work their magic with sufficient context; compare, e.g., $B_1' + \dots B_n'$ B_1' + \dots B_n' to $B_1' + \dots + B_n'$ B_1' + \dots + B_n' . You can explicitly tell the compiler you want "dots for binary operators" using \dotsb , as, for example, $B_1' + \dotsb B_n'$ B_1' + \dotsb B_n' , if that is what you want. I edited both of these.
|
|
Jan 21 at 15:13 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
TeX; deleted "thank you"
|
Jan 21 at 14:58 | history | asked | matilda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |