Timeline for Regularity of sparse Fourier transforms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2013 at 22:25 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @SyangChen my mistake - thanks for pointing this out | |
| Jul 10, 2013 at 22:25 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
completed a mathematical correction and added some references
|
| Jul 10, 2013 at 16:54 | history | edited | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Joined in the LaTeX fun, added mathematical caveat/correction
|
| Jul 10, 2013 at 16:50 | history | edited | Andrew Stacey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed maths rendering (since I was already fixing the question here)
|
| Jul 15, 2012 at 8:25 | comment | added | Syang Chen | @Yemon, could you tell me on which page I can find the proof of the statement you stated at the beginning? I found the statement that Lip$_\alpha$ implies Fourier coefficient decays like $O(1/n^{\alpha})$, but I couldn't find the converse. Thank you. | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 14:32 | comment | added | Matthew Daws | Great! Will have a look at Katznelson, but at the very least, this gives me an intuition about what's going on. | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 14:28 | vote | accept | Matthew Daws | ||
| Nov 8, 2009 at 14:28 | vote | accept | Matthew Daws | ||
| Nov 8, 2009 at 14:28 | |||||
| Nov 8, 2009 at 11:43 | history | answered | Yemon Choi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |