Timeline for Reference for isomorphism between group cohomology and singular cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 18 at 10:48 | vote | accept | Aidan | ||
Jan 18 at 2:16 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Jan 18 at 2:15 | comment | added | Chris Gerig | You're right, updated response. | |
Jan 18 at 2:11 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 48 characters in body
|
Jan 18 at 2:04 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 83 characters in body
|
Jan 18 at 1:59 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 83 characters in body
|
Jan 18 at 1:19 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
`--` -> –
|
Jan 18 at 0:55 | comment | added | Andy Putman | What does the Kan-Thurston theorem have to do with this? We already know that $X$ is a $K(G,1)$. | |
Jan 18 at 0:55 | comment | added | Dmitri Pavlov | What exactly is the relevance of the Kan–Thurston theorem here? The OP explicitly states that X is a classifying space for a discrete group G, which by definition makes it weakly equivalent (and not merely homology equivalent) to K(G,1). | |
Jan 18 at 0:50 | history | answered | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 4.0 |