Timeline for Representations of finite abelian groups
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 17 at 21:39 | comment | added | Miranda | @YCor: Ah, good point, thanks to all! | |
Jan 17 at 21:26 | review | Close votes | |||
Jan 25 at 3:02 | |||||
Jan 17 at 21:08 | comment | added | YCor | @Miranda for nonzero $f$ in this subalgebra, $f^{-1}$ is a polynomial in $f$ so is in the subalgebra too. | |
Jan 17 at 19:22 | comment | added | Miranda | Ah, I see: the point is that since $G$ is abelian, the image of $G$ in $End(V)$ lies in $End_G(V)$, which is a division ring. You then argue that the subalgebra generated by the image of $G$ in $End_G(V)$ is a commutative division ring (I guess you have to show that it is closed under inverses?), and thus a field. It then follows from the standard fact that Simon quotes. Is this a correct summary? | |
Jan 17 at 19:16 | comment | added | YCor | (To apply the previous comment you need to observe that the subalgebra generated by the image of $G$ is a field.) | |
Jan 17 at 19:14 | comment | added | Simon Wadsley | You need the result that every finite subgroup of the multiplicative group of a field is cyclic. The easiest way to prove this is by using that a polynomial of degree $d$ has at most $d$ roots and that a finite abelian group is cyclic if and only if it's order is its exponent. | |
S Jan 17 at 19:02 | review | First questions | |||
Jan 17 at 23:51 | |||||
S Jan 17 at 19:02 | history | asked | Miranda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |