Timeline for expectation of the product of Gaussian kernels and their input
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17 at 4:30 | vote | accept | patchouli | ||
| Jan 17 at 4:30 | vote | accept | patchouli | ||
| Jan 17 at 4:30 | |||||
| Jan 16 at 18:35 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 16 at 18:13 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 16 at 16:42 | history | edited | patchouli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 56 characters in body
|
| Jan 16 at 16:41 | comment | added | patchouli | @IosifPinelis Sorry, I was a little unsure about that as well. (i), based on what I heard from my friend, I think that's the interpretation. (ii) They are constant vectors. This is not my focus, so I'm not sure if there's any better way to write it. Feel free to edit the equation. | |
| Jan 16 at 3:47 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | (i) By $\mathbb{E}{\mathbf{z} \sim \mathcal{N}(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{I})}$, do you mean the expectation assuming $\mathbf{z} \sim \mathcal{N}(\mathbf{0}, \mathbf{I})$? (ii) What are $\mathbf{x}{i}$ and $\mathbf{x}{j}$? | |
| Jan 16 at 3:09 | history | asked | patchouli | CC BY-SA 4.0 |