Timeline for Is there an absolute geometry that underlies spherical, Euclidean and hyperbolic geometry?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13 at 18:49 | history | edited | Mozibur Ullah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 143 characters in body
|
| Jan 13 at 17:24 | answer | added | Robert Bryant | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 13 at 16:36 | answer | added | Moishe Kohan | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jan 13 at 16:35 | comment | added | Deane Yang | Another book discusses unified geometry in terms of axioms is Kay, College Geometry : A Unified Development, specifically Chapter 5. I'm also pretty sure that the discusson there can be connected to @Ycor's answer below. | |
| Jan 13 at 9:48 | comment | added | quarta | Possibly useful; "Geometry and Groups",by Nikulin and Shafarevich. | |
| Jan 13 at 5:58 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jan 13 at 3:51 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo
|
| Jan 13 at 1:25 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Suggest some more recent books that deal with the axiomatic method; Hartshorne Geometry: Euclid and Beyond. Greenberg Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries. I'm in the fourth edition of Marvin's book. An article by Marvin you would find helpful maa.org/programs/maa-awards/writing-awards/… and pdf at maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/upload_library/22/Ford/… | |
| Jan 12 at 23:52 | answer | added | YCor | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jan 12 at 23:51 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed capitals from title
|
| Jan 12 at 23:47 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | As we know (post-Hilbert), Euclid's axioms were inadequate, hence, was Bolyai's notion of neutral geometry. What is your definition of neutral geometry? | |
| Jan 12 at 22:26 | comment | added | Marco Ripà | Projective geometry, maybe? | |
| Jan 12 at 21:56 | history | asked | Mozibur Ullah | CC BY-SA 4.0 |