Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jan 20 at 15:57 history bounty ended Paul R
S Jan 20 at 15:57 history notice removed Paul R
Jan 20 at 15:57 vote accept Paul R
Jan 17 at 11:33 comment added Gerry Myerson "Paul R is looking for an answer from a reputable source." Are you suggesting that Kuipers and Niederreiter is a disreputable source?
Jan 17 at 4:59 answer added Iosif Pinelis timeline score: 5
Jan 16 at 10:21 answer added Gerry Myerson timeline score: 9
S Jan 16 at 8:51 history bounty started Paul R
S Jan 16 at 8:51 history notice added Paul R Authoritative reference needed
Jan 12 at 17:14 comment added Dan Piponi I'm thinking of something like this: pure.ed.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/12417914/download_2.pdf (Took forever to find that paper again because of the name of the author!) But the paper itself says the implementation performs "abysmally". There's also something like this which is also slow: fredrikj.net/arb I think this only works with analytic functions so may not be suitable for you.
Jan 12 at 12:43 comment added Paul R @DanPiponi , can you give more information?
Jan 11 at 23:13 comment added Dan Piponi The machinery for integration in constructive analysis gives rise to algorithms that can be implemented for real (no pun...) and which can deliver you a result with guarantees on the error without any knowledge of derivatives. This is because they, in effect, do interval arithmetic. Not necessarily fast though - if that matters to you.
Jan 11 at 20:24 comment added Christian Remling Sampling $f$ on a set of measure zero (in particular, on a finite or countable set) can never give you any information on $\int f$ unless you also have control on how fast $f$ varies.
Jan 11 at 19:45 history asked Paul R CC BY-SA 4.0