Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 7 at 23:24 comment added JustSomeGuy I understand, thanks to everyone for the help
Jan 7 at 20:13 comment added fedja If $F$ is $L$-Lipschitz, then $Area(F(A))\le L\int_{[0,1]}\text{length}(F(\ell_x\cap A))\,dx$, so if $\max_y\text{length}(F(\ell_y))>0$, you have your $C(F)$, but if the latter maximum is $0$, then the whole image of the square has $0$ area. So, if the constant is allowed to depend on $F$, there is no problem. Unfortunately, as Anton said already, a universal constant is out of question.
Jan 7 at 19:18 comment added JustSomeGuy @AntonPetrunin could you explain your statement? I don’t mind if $C=C(F)$, but $C$ cannot depend on $A$…
Jan 7 at 18:33 comment added Anton Petrunin Note the constant $C$ cannot be chosen independently from $F$. If $C=C(F)$, then it seems to be easy to prove.
Jan 7 at 17:28 comment added fedja Ah, yes. I misinterpreted the question. You are right. Let me think a bit then :-)
Jan 7 at 17:25 comment added JustSomeGuy It seems to work: the area is $2\epsilon\cdot \sqrt2 $, and for all $x$ $\mathrm{Length}(F[\ell_x\cap A])=2\sqrt2 \epsilon$, and for all $y$ $\mathrm{Length}(F[\ell_y])=1$.
Jan 7 at 6:55 comment added fedja Erm... How about the identity map and the $\varepsilon$-neighborhood of the diagonal?
Jan 7 at 4:37 review Close votes
Jan 23 at 12:25
Jan 7 at 2:46 history edited JustSomeGuy CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Jan 7 at 2:38 history edited JustSomeGuy CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Jan 7 at 2:19 history edited JustSomeGuy CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 108 characters in body
Jan 7 at 1:59 history asked JustSomeGuy CC BY-SA 4.0