Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 history edited Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5
typo
Nov 16, 2010 at 2:56 history edited Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5
added 90 characters in body
Nov 15, 2010 at 23:55 comment added Sándor Kovács @Torsten: I think I fixed it.
Nov 15, 2010 at 23:53 history edited Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5
added 252 characters in body
Nov 15, 2010 at 23:38 history edited Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5
added 483 characters in body
Nov 15, 2010 at 21:23 comment added Torsten Ekedahl 1) It is true that direct limits are always right exact. 2) I don't see why $M'\to Q_i$ is surjective which seems to be needed to get the surjectivity of $\mathrm{lim} K'_i \to M'$. 3) Note that without Ab5 finite generation should be formulated as $\mathrm{lim}M_i\to M$ surjective implies $M_j=M$ for some $j$.
Nov 15, 2010 at 20:57 history edited Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5
added 72 characters in body; added 100 characters in body
Nov 15, 2010 at 20:53 comment added Sándor Kovács @Torsten: Thanks! Yeah, I thought this would be the issue, but I did not want to clutter it with proposed "sticky points". However, in some sense, this is an issue already where I indicated, as I wrote $\Leftrightarrow$ even though there only $\Rightarrow$ is needed, but if it were true there it would have worked for the $K_i$.
Nov 15, 2010 at 20:50 history edited Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5
added 327 characters in body
Nov 15, 2010 at 20:45 comment added Torsten Ekedahl Your proposed sticky point is not one I think. However, without Ab5 directed colimits are not left exact so I don't think your conclusion that $\mathrm{lim} Q_i = 0$ implies $\mathrm{lim}K_i=M$ is justified (there seems to be problems with both injectivity and surjectivity of $\mathrm{lim}K_i\to M$).
Nov 15, 2010 at 20:28 history answered Sándor Kovács CC BY-SA 2.5