Timeline for Question on academic affiliation when submitting a paper
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5 at 14:47 | comment | added | David White | Yes, I think a footnote would also work. We don't seem to use them a lot in math papers, but it's not unheard of. I've also seen authors with two affiliations like "MIT and IAS" then one mailing address and one email address. | |
Jan 5 at 12:57 | comment | added | Jules Lamers | Ah alright, that makes more sense. Though the work was done at the old place, so it seems reasonable to acknowledge that. Another option, then, could be to add a (foot)note with the new affiliation and email address | |
Jan 2 at 22:50 | comment | added | David White | @JulesLamers I meant: papers we had in the publication pipeline. So, after it came back with a referee report, one of the changes we'd make would be his affiliation. But we didn't, for example, go update every single paper on arxiv including ones published years ago. | |
Jan 2 at 21:17 | comment | added | Jules Lamers | It seems unnecessary to update all preprints each time one moves between institutions. If someone can read your research paper, they will be able to find your current affiliation (most recent paper, google scholar, ...) in case an email bounces because the address is no longer in use | |
Jan 2 at 19:11 | history | answered | David White | CC BY-SA 4.0 |