Timeline for Countably representing all closed sets of positive measure
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 31, 2023 at 17:12 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Are expressions of gratitude and acknowledgments of helpful efforts by other users considered bad manners here? | |
Dec 31, 2023 at 17:09 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @MichaelGreinecker : Thank you for your comment. (It seems that my previous thank-you comments were deleted. I am trying again.) | |
Dec 31, 2023 at 17:09 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @AlekseiKulikov : Thank you for your comment. (It seems that my previous thank-you comments were deleted. I am trying again.) | |
Dec 31, 2023 at 16:31 | comment | added | Bedovlat | Great, thanks to everyone and happy New Year! | |
Dec 31, 2023 at 16:31 | vote | accept | Bedovlat | ||
Dec 31, 2023 at 16:05 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 108 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2023 at 16:02 | comment | added | Michael Greinecker | Even more elementary: Pick a point $x_m$ from each $C_m$ and enclose it by an open interval of length $3^{-m}$. Take the union of these intervals, and then the relative complement. | |
Dec 31, 2023 at 15:54 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 597 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2023 at 15:47 | comment | added | Aleksei Kulikov | Doesn't any set of positive measure contain a closed subset of positive measure, so the first sentence about closeness is irrelevant, no? So the answer is still no. | |
Dec 31, 2023 at 15:44 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
Dec 31, 2023 at 15:36 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |