Skip to main content
added 108 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.7k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$$C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty ([0,1]\setminus C_m)=[0,1]\setminus\bigcup_{m=1}^\infty C_m$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.


Using the hint by Aleksei Kulikov (why didn't I think of that? :-)), one can modify the above construction as follows, to get an unqualified no:

Suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $B:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$$B:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty ([0,1]\setminus C_m)=[0,1]\setminus\bigcup_{m=1}^\infty C_m$.

Then $|B|\ge1/2>0$ and $C_m\not\subseteq B$ for any $m$. Let finally $C$ be a closed subset of $B$ with $|C|>0$; such a set $C$ exists by the regularity of the Lebesgue measure. Then $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$. $\quad\Box$

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.


Using the hint by Aleksei Kulikov (why didn't I think of that? :-)), one can modify the above construction as follows, to get an unqualified no:

Suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $B:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|B|\ge1/2>0$ and $C_m\not\subseteq B$ for any $m$. Let finally $C$ be a closed subset of $B$ with $|C|>0$; such a set $C$ exists by the regularity of the Lebesgue measure. Then $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$. $\quad\Box$

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty ([0,1]\setminus C_m)=[0,1]\setminus\bigcup_{m=1}^\infty C_m$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.


Using the hint by Aleksei Kulikov (why didn't I think of that? :-)), one can modify the above construction as follows, to get an unqualified no:

Suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $B:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty ([0,1]\setminus C_m)=[0,1]\setminus\bigcup_{m=1}^\infty C_m$.

Then $|B|\ge1/2>0$ and $C_m\not\subseteq B$ for any $m$. Let finally $C$ be a closed subset of $B$ with $|C|>0$; such a set $C$ exists by the regularity of the Lebesgue measure. Then $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$. $\quad\Box$

added 597 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.7k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.


Using the hint by Aleksei Kulikov (why didn't I think of that? :-)), one can modify the above construction as follows, to get an unqualified no:

Suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $B:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|B|\ge1/2>0$ and $C_m\not\subseteq B$ for any $m$. Let finally $C$ be a closed subset of $B$ with $|C|>0$; such a set $C$ exists by the regularity of the Lebesgue measure. Then $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$. $\quad\Box$

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.


Using the hint by Aleksei Kulikov (why didn't I think of that? :-)), one can modify the above construction as follows, to get an unqualified no:

Suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $B:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|B|\ge1/2>0$ and $C_m\not\subseteq B$ for any $m$. Let finally $C$ be a closed subset of $B$ with $|C|>0$; such a set $C$ exists by the regularity of the Lebesgue measure. Then $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$. $\quad\Box$

added 68 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.7k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

NoWithout the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no. Suppose

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.

No. Suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.

Without the assumption that $C$ be closed the answer is no.

Indeed, suppose such $C_m$'s exist. Then without loss of generality $|C_m|\le1/3^m$ for all $m$. Let now $C:=\bigcap_{m=1}^\infty C_m^c$.

Then $|C|\ge1/2>0$, but $C_m\not\subseteq C$ for any $m$.

Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.7k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229
Loading