Skip to main content

Timeline for On the convergence of a martingale

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 27, 2023 at 21:15 comment added Greyearl @ChristopheLeuridan Thanks for your comment. It is actually very close and interesting as well! Indeed, it's not necessarily a true martingale. We can open another thread to study the convergence of $\left(W_{\sigma_t}\right)$.
Dec 27, 2023 at 21:07 comment added Christophe Leuridan This question is surprinzingly close to the conjecture I made in my partial answer at mathoverflow.net/questions/460751/another-curious-martingale/… However, I think that there is a typo here. The martingale that I considered is $(X_{\sigma_t})_{t \ge 0}$, and not $(W_{A_t})$. It do not know whether this last process is a martingale.
Dec 26, 2023 at 6:26 history became hot network question
Dec 25, 2023 at 23:58 vote accept Greyearl
Dec 25, 2023 at 23:40 comment added Greyearl That’s true, it might require a localization argument as the intregrand is not bounded, but it can be proven. Thank you !
Dec 25, 2023 at 23:37 comment added Thomas Kojar every Itô integral has zero expectation and so the increment disappears.
Dec 25, 2023 at 23:35 history edited Greyearl CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Dec 25, 2023 at 23:34 comment added Greyearl Yes, you are right, it is actually $M_t:= B_{A_t}$. I have edited the original post. Can we prove that M is a true martingale?
Dec 25, 2023 at 23:29 comment added Thomas Kojar actually, are you sure this is the right martingale you have in mind? Shouldn't it be $M_{t}=B_{A_{t}}$ equivalently $M_{\sigma_{t}}=B_{t}$?
Dec 25, 2023 at 22:53 answer added Thomas Kojar timeline score: 5
Dec 25, 2023 at 22:44 history edited Greyearl CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Dec 25, 2023 at 22:25 history asked Greyearl CC BY-SA 4.0