Timeline for Explanation and Definition of Iwahori order
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Nov 8, 2009 at 21:10 | vote | accept | Casebash | ||
| Nov 8, 2009 at 18:12 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 17:57 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 8:57 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Thanks. Well, it seems that Iwahori order and Iwahori subgroups are an order of magnitude harder, or more technical, than your original question about the Jacobson radical - though since this is outside my own "safe zone", I might be wrong here. | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 8:32 | comment | added | Casebash | I am completing my second honors level maths subject at Sydney University (roughly equivalent to graduate level in the US) | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 8:21 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | It would help even more if you could indicate what level (roughly) your mathematical work/studies/interests are. Otherwise people might waste time being overly technical, or pointing to more sophisticated variants that you have no interest in or use for... | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 6:49 | comment | added | Casebash | My background info is that someone used it in the answer I linked to and a Google search doesn't give me anything useful | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 6:29 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | Questions will get better answers, and more upvotes, if you provide a little more background and/or motivation. | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 6:01 | answer | added | Rob Harron | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 8, 2009 at 5:21 | history | asked | Casebash | CC BY-SA 2.5 |