Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 11, 2023 at 18:12 comment added jjcale The Reed Simon books.
Dec 11, 2023 at 14:34 comment added Christian Remling How about Thirring's 4 volume series: springer.com/series/647
Dec 11, 2023 at 12:41 comment added Willie Wong I think the question could be improved if you can give some example of what it means to have a book that "generally introduces [any subject] as a whole" in a mathematical way. My feeling is that most "introductory" mathematical books are deliberately narrowly focused so as to get through some basic ideas, and refrain from making the most general discussion of the whole of the subject. For example, there are many excellent classic texts in mathematical physics (Courant and Hilbert for one, Reed and Simon for another). But I wouldn't say any of them touches the subject "as a whole".
Dec 11, 2023 at 12:33 comment added Willie Wong @BenMcKay I don't think the OP intended the question to read "a book that generally introduces mathematical physics as was understood in 1952..." :-) (To be fair, I was very, very tempted to make the same comment.)
S Dec 11, 2023 at 11:57 review Reopen votes
Jan 10 at 12:04
S Dec 11, 2023 at 11:57 history edited gmvh CC BY-SA 4.0
Removed additional question and reworded question to be more focussed on a textbook recommendation Added to review
Dec 11, 2023 at 11:40 history closed Daniele Tampieri
Willie Wong
Dave Benson
Kostya_I
Carlo Beenakker
Needs more focus
Dec 11, 2023 at 10:47 comment added Ben McKay Courant and Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics.
Dec 11, 2023 at 10:26 comment added Jules Lamers Here's what they have to say about the differences between mathematical and theoretical physics on Physics.SE: physics.stackexchange.com/q/56293
Dec 11, 2023 at 9:07 review Close votes
Dec 11, 2023 at 11:43
Dec 11, 2023 at 8:58 comment added Daniele Tampieri Welcome @ale_7 to the Math Overflow. Your question is so wildly broad as it is interesting, therefore it will (in my humble opinion) hardly find an exhaustive and not opinion driven answer. However I'll try to do something below.
Dec 11, 2023 at 8:40 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body; edited tags
S Dec 11, 2023 at 8:25 review First questions
Dec 11, 2023 at 9:01
S Dec 11, 2023 at 8:25 history asked ale_7 CC BY-SA 4.0