Skip to main content
Minor Math Jaxing and formatting
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45

A question about the regularity of the Schrödinger equation?

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations[1], I noticed I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases}\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, &\text{in } \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

  • $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and
  • $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)$, called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying $a(u,v) = \lambda(u,v)$ for all $v \in H_0^1(\Omega)$.

Now$$ a(u,v) = \lambda(u,v)\quad\forall v \in H_0^1(\Omega).$$ Now, if $(\lambda, u) \in \mathbb{R}\times H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $Vu \in L^2(\Omega)$, can we deduce from the regularity of the Poisson equation that $u=(-\Delta )^{-1} (Vu+\lambda u) \in H^2(\Omega)$?

[1] Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite"Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computationscomputations", J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). MR2421883, ZBL1174Zbl 1174.65047.

A question about the regularity of the Schrödinger equation?

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)$, called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying $a(u,v) = \lambda(u,v)$ for all $v \in H_0^1(\Omega)$.

Now, if $(\lambda, u) \in \mathbb{R}\times H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $Vu \in L^2(\Omega)$, can we deduce from the regularity of the Poisson equation that $u=(-\Delta )^{-1} (Vu+\lambda u) \in H^2(\Omega)$?

Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

A question about the regularity of the Schrödinger equation

While reading the article [1], I noticed I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, &\text{in } \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where

  • $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$ and
  • $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)$, called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying $$ a(u,v) = \lambda(u,v)\quad\forall v \in H_0^1(\Omega).$$ Now, if $(\lambda, u) \in \mathbb{R}\times H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $Vu \in L^2(\Omega)$, can we deduce from the regularity of the Poisson equation that $u=(-\Delta )^{-1} (Vu+\lambda u) \in H^2(\Omega)$?

[1] Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, "Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations", J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). MR2421883, Zbl 1174.65047.

improved formatted
Source Link

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector u ∈ H1 0 (Ω)$u\in H_0^1(\Omega)$, called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying $a(u,v) = \lambda(u,v)$ for all $v \in H_0^1(\Omega)$.

Now, if $(\lambda, u) \in \mathbb{R}\times H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $Vu \in L^2(\Omega)$, can we deduce from the regularity of the Poisson equation that $u=(-\Delta )^{-1} (Vu+\lambda u) \in H^2(\Omega)$?

Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector u ∈ H1 0 (Ω), called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying

Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector $u\in H_0^1(\Omega)$, called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying $a(u,v) = \lambda(u,v)$ for all $v \in H_0^1(\Omega)$.

Now, if $(\lambda, u) \in \mathbb{R}\times H_0^1(\Omega)$ and $Vu \in L^2(\Omega)$, can we deduce from the regularity of the Poisson equation that $u=(-\Delta )^{-1} (Vu+\lambda u) \in H^2(\Omega)$?

Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Sam Hopkins
  • 24.2k
  • 5
  • 97
  • 171

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector u ∈ H1 0 (Ω), called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying   

Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector u ∈ H1 0 (Ω), called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying  Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

While reading the article Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, I don't understand part of the proof of regularity. For the Schrödinger eigenvalue problem,

\begin{cases} -\Delta u+Vu=\lambda u, \ \text{in}\ \Omega \\ \Vert u\Vert_{0,\Omega}=1 \end{cases} where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain in $\mathbb{R}^3$, $V =\frac{1}{|x|}$.

Define $$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v+Vuv,\ u,v\in H_0^1(\Omega)$$ A number $\lambda$ is called an eigenvalue of the form $a(\cdot, \cdot)$ relative to the form $(\cdot, \cdot)$ if there is a nonzero vector u ∈ H1 0 (Ω), called an associated eigenfunction, satisfying 

Gong, Xingao; Shen, Lihua; Zhang, Dier; Zhou, Aihui, Finite element approximations for Schrödinger equations with applications to electronic structure computations, J. Comput. Math. 26, No. 3, 310-323 (2008). ZBL1174.65047.

edited body; edited title
Source Link
GH from MO
  • 105.2k
  • 8
  • 292
  • 398
Loading
Source Link
Loading