Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 9, 2023 at 14:45 history edited user479223 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 202 characters in body
Dec 8, 2023 at 23:37 comment added user479223 @NateRiver By the way, this gives an example of a continuous, increasing, bounded function with arbitrarily bad local modulus of continuity. Just replace $\log$ with $\log\log$ or even more slowly diverging functions. Differentiable a.e. but arbitrarily bad.
Dec 8, 2023 at 20:06 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Holder -> Hölder
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:22 comment added user479223 The theorem about reparameterization uses the variation. The variation of an increasing function is always the function itself. So it is the inverse of the function. So stupid. I love math.
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:20 comment added user479223 @NateRiver hah. What a stupid answer. Beautiful
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:19 comment added Nate River I was just thinking about that. Actually, how bad is the reparametrization allowed to be? Because since $f$ is increasing continuous, we can reparametrize by its inverse and it just becomes the identity, which is Lipschitz.
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:18 comment added user479223 @NateRiver Actually this is a really nice counterexample for something else too. Everyone knows that $\alpha$ Holder implies finite $1/\alpha$ variation. However finite $p$ variation doesn't imply $1/p$ Holder - only after a reparameterization. This is bounded variation but nowhere locally $\alpha$ Holder. I wonder what the reparameterization is...
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:06 comment added user479223 @NateRiver Continuous, increasing, bounded but nowhere locally $\alpha$ Holder for any $\alpha$. What an awful function.
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:03 vote accept Nate River
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:03 comment added Nate River Very nice! The idea to use logs is great.
Dec 8, 2023 at 18:00 history edited user479223 CC BY-SA 4.0
added 16 characters in body
Dec 8, 2023 at 17:53 history answered user479223 CC BY-SA 4.0