Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 11, 2023 at 15:50 comment added YCor I guess "isometric embedding" is to be interpreted in the Riemannian sense, i.e., infinitesimally isometric, and not in the stronger metric sense (distance-preserving). [The standard embedding in $\mathbf{R}^3$ is not distance-preserving!]
Dec 11, 2023 at 15:48 history edited YCor
edited tags
Dec 9, 2023 at 22:56 comment added Ryan Budney The question refers to rigidity, i.e. does the group of isometries of $\mathbb R^n$ act transitively on the isometric embeddings of $S^2$ in $\mathbb R^n$. As mentioned, the answer is generally no.
Dec 9, 2023 at 20:49 comment added Deane Yang @WillieWong’s counterexample is still one for your new version of the question.
Dec 9, 2023 at 16:02 comment added Daniel Asimov (Although you don't state explicitly what you mean by "S^2 ⊆ R^n".)
Dec 9, 2023 at 16:00 comment added Daniel Asimov Since R^1 smoothly embeds isometrically in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of R^2, R^3 does the same in R^6. So if we first place S^2 in R^3 as the usual unit sphere, and then embed R^3 in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of R^6, this provides a counterexample to your question.
Dec 9, 2023 at 14:09 history edited mmaatthh CC BY-SA 4.0
added 9 characters in body
Dec 9, 2023 at 14:07 comment added mmaatthh @WillieWong, my question should be claified as the follows: Is $𝑓(𝑆^2)$ always $\mathbb{S}^2\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ modulo an isometry of $\mathbb{R}^n$?
Dec 8, 2023 at 14:12 comment added Willie Wong If you mean $\mathbb{R}^3\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ as a vector subspace, then the answer is no. There are many isometric embeddings of $\mathbb{R}^3$ into $\mathbb{R}^4$ that is not extrinsically flat (just roll it up like a fruit roll up).
Dec 8, 2023 at 13:43 history asked mmaatthh CC BY-SA 4.0