Timeline for $l^2(L^p)$ Decoupling constant of congruent tubes
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 at 6:23 | vote | accept | Vstal | ||
| Dec 20, 2023 at 6:23 | answer | added | Vstal | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 20, 2023 at 6:22 | history | edited | Vstal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1777 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2023 at 12:03 | history | edited | Vstal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1777 characters in body
|
| Dec 1, 2023 at 18:38 | comment | added | Ben Johnsrude | Willie is correct - tubes should in particular be bounded sets. After fixing some typos ($n-1$ in the set-builder notation instead of $n$), you have instead defined a decomposition of thickened hyperplanes. Adding on to this, your calculation of the Fourier projections is incorrect; you have forgotten to pair with the Schwartz function $\hat{f}$, so the integrals will of course not classically converge. | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 15:31 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Doesn't a tube have compact cross section? I thought in this business a tube is something like $[a,b]\times B_r(x^*)$. | |
| S Dec 1, 2023 at 15:15 | review | First questions | |||
| Dec 1, 2023 at 16:12 | |||||
| S Dec 1, 2023 at 15:15 | history | asked | Vstal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |