Timeline for Why should we expect this odd behavior of negative binomial distributions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2023 at 23:09 | vote | accept | Michael Hardy | ||
| Dec 4, 2023 at 22:59 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 4, 2023 at 21:46 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | ok, Part of the answer is starting to become clear, I think. | |
| Dec 2, 2023 at 19:27 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | @CommandMaster : I think I may try that later today$\,\ldots \qquad$ | |
| Dec 2, 2023 at 19:25 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Dec 1, 2023 at 13:28 | comment | added | Dieter Kadelka | Plotting with 3100:3200 again looks quite different. Here the period may be around 25. | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 13:01 | comment | added | Dieter Kadelka | I don't understand. If you plot from 1250 to 1300 you get a periodicity of 4. Isn't this the usual effect if you approximate real numbers by integers? | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 3:59 | comment | added | Daniel Weber | It might be due to the fact that it only takes integers — can you try to graph the fractional part of $nq/p +2\sqrt{nq}/p$? | |
| Dec 1, 2023 at 3:46 | history | asked | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |