Timeline for Non-simple groups $G$ with only non-trivial quotient isomorphic to $G$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2023 at 10:35 | comment | added | YCor | @DaveBenson I also understood you're referring to your comment "If the question were to understand the non-simple groups with property Q, I think it might not get closed." My point is that first I'm not sure I noticed this comment, and also I didn't think of my answer as a "reinterpretation". However, I didn't address the "large cardinal" question in this cw answer, and indeed in this case, as you suggested, the question needs to be modified to ask about only about nonsimple pseudosimple groups. | |
| Nov 29, 2023 at 8:37 | comment | added | Dave Benson | That's not what I meant. I was referring to my comment below the question. | |
| Nov 29, 2023 at 6:21 | comment | added | YCor | @DaveBenson I don't think I'm "reinterpreting". The question is quite clear, stated twice (in title and body). The meaning of "isomorphic" is clear-cut: "there exists an isomorphism". When somebody uses "is isomorphic" to mean "some canonical map is an isomorphic" it's just ill-stated. I saw little point in using this wrong interpretation to get an uninteresting question. | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 22:06 | comment | added | Dave Benson | Thanks for taking seriously my suggestion for reinterpreting the question. The question of understanding the non-abelian non-simple groups with the given property seems like an interesting one that has not really been satisfactorily answered at this point. | |
| Nov 28, 2023 at 15:11 | vote | accept | Dominic van der Zypen | ||
| Nov 30, 2023 at 7:57 | |||||
| S Nov 28, 2023 at 13:41 | history | answered | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 | |
| S Nov 28, 2023 at 13:41 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by YCor |