Timeline for If we don't care about uniqueness, can we relax the coercivity condition in Lax-Milgram theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2023 at 10:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 21, 2023 at 3:09 | |||||
| Nov 26, 2023 at 9:05 | comment | added | Akira | @MichaelRenardy You are right! I was being stupid :( | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 5:48 | vote | accept | Akira | ||
| Nov 26, 2023 at 5:15 | answer | added | leo monsaingeon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 26, 2023 at 5:04 | history | edited | leo monsaingeon | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typo in the definition of continuity
|
| Nov 26, 2023 at 3:22 | comment | added | Michael Renardy | This looks like trying to kill a fly with a sledgehammer. If you have only one boundary condition, cannot you just complement it arbitrarily to from a full set of initial conditions, and use existence and uniqueness for the IVP? Or am I missing something? | |
| Nov 25, 2023 at 21:33 | history | asked | Akira | CC BY-SA 4.0 |