Skip to main content
added 404 characters in body
Source Link

The mapping from the regular solids to $\mathbb{Z}_5$ given by the number of faces in the solid mod 5, interestingly, is a bijection. Any geometers or algebraists know if there is a significant reason for this? I mean, the fact that it is a possibility (i.e. that there are exactly 5 regular solids) is a well known proof, but why is this particular mapping bijective? Just seems too much of a coincidence.

Its been 40 years since I understood the proof in grad school, and it's long since gone from my memory - perhaps this fact is even buried in the proof? Any grad students fresh off understanding the proof?

Following on comments below, more generally in $\mathbb{R}^n$, if there are $k$ regular polytopes, and we look at the mapping from these regular polytopes to $\mathbb{Z}_k$ given by $f|k$ ($f$ modulo $k$) where $f$ is the number of faces in the polytope, then (if comments below are correct), the mapping is a bijection iff $n=3|6$ or $n=5|6$. And so the question is, is there a deep reason for this?

The mapping from the regular solids to $\mathbb{Z}_5$ given by the number of faces in the solid mod 5, interestingly, is a bijection. Any geometers or algebraists know if there is a significant reason for this? I mean, the fact that it is a possibility (i.e. that there are exactly 5 regular solids) is a well known proof, but why is this particular mapping bijective? Just seems too much of a coincidence.

Its been 40 years since I understood the proof in grad school, and it's long since gone from my memory - perhaps this fact is even buried in the proof? Any grad students fresh off understanding the proof?

The mapping from the regular solids to $\mathbb{Z}_5$ given by the number of faces in the solid mod 5, interestingly, is a bijection. Any geometers or algebraists know if there is a significant reason for this? I mean, the fact that it is a possibility (i.e. that there are exactly 5 regular solids) is a well known proof, but why is this particular mapping bijective? Just seems too much of a coincidence.

Its been 40 years since I understood the proof in grad school, and it's long since gone from my memory - perhaps this fact is even buried in the proof? Any grad students fresh off understanding the proof?

Following on comments below, more generally in $\mathbb{R}^n$, if there are $k$ regular polytopes, and we look at the mapping from these regular polytopes to $\mathbb{Z}_k$ given by $f|k$ ($f$ modulo $k$) where $f$ is the number of faces in the polytope, then (if comments below are correct), the mapping is a bijection iff $n=3|6$ or $n=5|6$. And so the question is, is there a deep reason for this?

edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
added 9 characters in body; edited title
Source Link

Regular solids and $Z_5$$\mathbb{Z}_5$

The mapping from the regular solids to $Z_5$$\mathbb{Z}_5$ given by the number of sidesfaces in the solid mod 5, interestingly, is a bijection. Any geometers or algebraists know if there is a significant reason for this? I mean, the fact that it is a possibility (i.e. that there are exactly 5 regular solids) is a well known proof, but why is this particular mapping bijective? Just seems too much of a coincidence.

Its been 40 years since I understood the proof in grad school, and it's long since gone from my memory - perhaps this fact is even buried in the proof? Any grad students fresh off understanding the proof?

Regular solids and $Z_5$

The mapping from the regular solids to $Z_5$ given by the number of sides in the solid mod 5, interestingly, is a bijection. Any geometers or algebraists know if there is a significant reason for this? I mean, the fact that it is a possibility (i.e. that there are exactly 5 regular solids) is a well known proof, but why is this particular mapping bijective? Just seems too much of a coincidence.

Its been 40 years since I understood the proof in grad school, and it's long since gone from my memory - perhaps this fact is even buried in the proof? Any grad students fresh off understanding the proof?

Regular solids and $\mathbb{Z}_5$

The mapping from the regular solids to $\mathbb{Z}_5$ given by the number of faces in the solid mod 5, interestingly, is a bijection. Any geometers or algebraists know if there is a significant reason for this? I mean, the fact that it is a possibility (i.e. that there are exactly 5 regular solids) is a well known proof, but why is this particular mapping bijective? Just seems too much of a coincidence.

Its been 40 years since I understood the proof in grad school, and it's long since gone from my memory - perhaps this fact is even buried in the proof? Any grad students fresh off understanding the proof?

added 155 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading