Timeline for Potentially elementary question on affine functions on Banach spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2023 at 18:45 | comment | added | i like math | Only "thank you very much; your help has been invaluable and I really appreciate it." Marked as accepted. | |
| Nov 15, 2023 at 18:44 | vote | accept | i like math | ||
| Nov 14, 2023 at 15:11 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @ilikemath : Thanks, I have the paper. | |
| Nov 14, 2023 at 15:11 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @ilikemath : I have not read all the paper, but suspect that the results should remain valid. Perhaps, it is enough to define $\varphi$ only on $G$. I think you can check that. | |
| Nov 14, 2023 at 15:10 | comment | added | i like math | You probably already have access to the paper, but just in case you don't, it is available free online here. | |
| Nov 14, 2023 at 15:08 | comment | added | i like math | Thank you! I think it's safe to assume that the $x_i^*$ are pairwise distinct. It seems that the main conclusion of the paper depends on this $\varphi$ being affine, so is the paper simply invalid? | |
| Nov 14, 2023 at 14:44 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |