Timeline for Resolution of singularities
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 25, 2011 at 14:58 | history | edited | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
typo
|
Nov 12, 2010 at 17:34 | history | edited | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Fixed some typos, reordered the *EDIT*
|
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:22 | comment | added | user5117 | Of course you're right; for some reason when I read "K_{Y/Z} > 0" I interpreted it as "K_{Y/Z} is numerically positive". In retrospect, I have no idea why... | |
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:18 | history | edited | Sándor Kovács | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
LaTeX typo
|
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:17 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | I don't think so, am I being dumb for some reason? If I blow up a point on ${\mathbb A}^2=X$, obtaining $f:{\widetilde{X}} \to X$, then $K_{\widetilde X}−f^*K_X=K_{\widetilde{X}/X}= $+1 copy of the exceptional divisor. | |
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:12 | history | edited | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 170 characters in body
|
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:10 | comment | added | user5117 | Should it read K_{Y/Z} < 0, and the same for K_{Y/X}? | |
Nov 12, 2010 at 14:02 | history | answered | Karl Schwede | CC BY-SA 2.5 |