Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 1, 2023 at 16:57 comment added Tyler Lawson @MoriB. The bounded-belowness is used to try and determine the indicator $g(0,\infty)$ as somehow preferred among indicators; but I believe that you can still get the result for filtered spectra. (I just want to hedge my bets because I believe that I'd need to think carefully about it.) Any compact object certainly has some bound below and so most of the same arguments immediately apply.
Nov 1, 2023 at 16:54 history edited Tyler Lawson CC BY-SA 4.0
added 813 characters in body
Nov 1, 2023 at 13:33 comment added Mori B. thanks @Tyler, I missed that you meant non negatively filtered, tho I probably should have gathered that’s what you meant when you said “equivalent to simplicial spectra”. Is the bounded-belowness used somewhere in this argument? Do you expect unbounded filtrations to have more automorphisms?
Nov 1, 2023 at 13:18 comment added Tyler Lawson @MoriB. I usually use it to denote the upward-pointing poset $(0 \to 1 \to 2 \to \dots)$. In this case, the equivalence of categories is between simplicial spectra and nonnegatively filtered spectra, rather than unbounded ones, which is why $\Bbb N$ appears rather than $\Bbb Z$.
Nov 1, 2023 at 5:07 comment added Mori B. Just to clarify, in the last paragraph, \mathbb N denotes a downward pointing poset? I might have expected Z in place of N as these are unbounded filtrations, but perhaps I’m misundestanding this equivalence.
Oct 31, 2023 at 23:44 history edited Tyler Lawson CC BY-SA 4.0
added 7 characters in body
Oct 31, 2023 at 23:32 vote accept Tim Campion
Oct 31, 2023 at 23:29 history edited Tyler Lawson CC BY-SA 4.0
added 71 characters in body
Oct 31, 2023 at 22:06 history edited Tyler Lawson CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Oct 31, 2023 at 21:44 history answered Tyler Lawson CC BY-SA 4.0