Timeline for If $p_1$ and $p_2$ are prime numbers, then either $p_1$ divides $\sum_{i=1}^{p_1-1} i^{p_1p_2-1}$ or $p_2$ divides $\sum_{i=1}^{p_2-1} i^{p_1p_2-1}$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Nov 1, 2023 at 12:10 | vote | accept | Raj Pratap Singh | ||
S Nov 1, 2023 at 12:10 | vote | accept | Raj Pratap Singh | ||
S Nov 1, 2023 at 12:10 | |||||
Nov 1, 2023 at 12:10 | vote | accept | Raj Pratap Singh | ||
S Nov 1, 2023 at 12:10 | |||||
Oct 31, 2023 at 20:40 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 31, 2023 at 20:22 | comment | added | GH from MO | The conjecture is not true in general, the counterexamples $n$ are precisely the Carmichael numbers. See my post below. | |
Oct 31, 2023 at 20:10 | answer | added | GH from MO | timeline score: 4 | |
Oct 31, 2023 at 19:02 | answer | added | Fedor Petrov | timeline score: 6 | |
S Oct 31, 2023 at 17:50 | history | suggested | Zerox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improve formation
|
Oct 31, 2023 at 17:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 31, 2023 at 17:50 | |||||
Oct 31, 2023 at 17:18 | history | edited | Raj Pratap Singh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Oct 31, 2023 at 16:53 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | The title and the text do not agree. | |
Oct 31, 2023 at 16:40 | comment | added | Raj Pratap Singh | @GH from MO yeah, I corrected it. | |
Oct 31, 2023 at 16:39 | history | edited | GH from MO | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed LaTeX
|
Oct 31, 2023 at 16:28 | history | edited | Raj Pratap Singh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
S Oct 31, 2023 at 16:23 | review | First questions | |||
Oct 31, 2023 at 19:07 | |||||
S Oct 31, 2023 at 16:23 | history | asked | Raj Pratap Singh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |