Timeline for How can we control the cardinality of $j(\kappa)$ for $\kappa$ an $\aleph_1$-strongly compact cardinal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2023 at 10:11 | vote | accept | Calliope Ryan-Smith | ||
| Oct 31, 2023 at 18:46 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed meta info from title
|
| Oct 31, 2023 at 18:31 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 14:53 | comment | added | Calliope Ryan-Smith | @JoelDavidHamkins That would be great! | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 14:46 | answer | added | Gabe Goldberg | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 14:42 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Are you interested in examples where a tighter bound is possible? I can do that. | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 14:18 | history | edited | Calliope Ryan-Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changing the convention to align with normal large cardinals
|
| Oct 31, 2023 at 14:02 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | I think it might be worthwhile still to swap them, since this convention is quite established now. I think many MO readers will appreciate it. | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 13:56 | comment | added | Calliope Ryan-Smith | @JoelDavidHamkins This is an unfortunate consequence of me following some old work of Kunen in which he uses $\lambda$ for the strongly compact cardinal. I probably should have swapped them in the question before posting it. | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 13:10 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Your variable names for $\lambda$ and $\kappa$ are backwards from the usual convention, for which one considers fine measures on $P_\kappa\lambda$ rather than $P_\lambda\kappa$. | |
| Oct 31, 2023 at 12:27 | history | asked | Calliope Ryan-Smith | CC BY-SA 4.0 |